Re: the future of pljava development - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Jack Orenstein
Subject Re: the future of pljava development
Date
Msg-id 4655F4E5.1070409@hds.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: the future of pljava development  ("Andrej Ricnik-Bay" <andrej.groups@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
I used to do Oracle development and could choose between PLSQL and the java alternative.
I chose PLSQL because java offerred no clear advantage, and it wasn't really java. You
could use String, but for performance Oracle recommended some proprietary string class.
If I'm remembering correctly, you had to use JDBC from your java code (running inside Oracle!)
to access the database. I didn't see the point of writing very simple procedural code in
a language clearly not suited to the task. The hard parts of my problem didn't magically
disappear because I could write i++ instead of i = i + 1.

This was over 4 years ago, and Oracle/java integration may have improved, but slight
improvements in this area really don't change the equation much.

Jack Orenstein

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: olivier
Date:
Subject: hundreds of schema vs hundreds of databases
Next
From: "Andrus"
Date:
Subject: How to create trigger if it does not exist