-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
- --On Friday, November 16, 2007 18:00:26 +0000 Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>
wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>>> Maybe the BF members could just run their default autoconf as part of the
>>> build if they have one.
>>
>> you lost me on that one ... Tom is hestitant about moving to 6.1 because we
>> don't know what the fall out will be ... since I imagine the fallout would
>> be in the configure/build stage, if we modified CVS to have a 6.1 configure
>> script in place, wouldn't the buildfarm servers not be a good means to test
>> *if* there is any fallout?
>
> If the first thing some of them do is re-run autoconf, then we should get
> test results for a variety of versions as found on various distros. We would
> then be able to tell which versions may or may not work which could help us
> when we need to upgrade, or if someone has problems with a specific version
> when hacking (which should be rare I appreciate).
Ah, okay, you are going for the 'remove pre-built configure from cvs' route ..
that works too, and does make sense ... wouldn't definitely make sure we get
broad coverage ...
- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFHPdwq4QvfyHIvDvMRAiqvAKDdtV+AtsFZe9WkbG+7GYPRs+0zvQCeJGxX
pY3WUGVHUgXtU1mfYIGAfBo=
=wyE3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
