Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 09:26:45AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> John DeSoi wrote:
>>> Maybe they could be convinced to use the "other" database supported by
>>> Drupal :).
>>>
>>>
>>> http://drupal.org/node/144228
>>>
>>> What's the deal?
>> As someone who has made a ton of money making Drupal work with
>> PostgreSQL, I would note that Durpal is not fast on PostgreSQL out of
>> the box. It needs help to get there.
>>
>> I don't know that they would be happy unless they had someone with Pg
>> experience helping them.
>
> Is it the drupal code itself that's the issue or just a matter of tuning
> PostgreSQL?
Both. Obviously tuning postgresql is a big part but they have some odd
query issues to deal with. And if they have *any* custom modules, oh boy.
Joshua D. Drake
