sytem log audit/reporting and psql - Mailing list pgsql-performance
From | Fei Liu |
---|---|
Subject | sytem log audit/reporting and psql |
Date | |
Msg-id | 4635F99A.1040303@aepnetworks.com Whole thread Raw |
Responses |
Re: sytem log audit/reporting and psql
|
List | pgsql-performance |
Hello group, I need to design and develop a web reporting system to let users query/view syslog files on a unix host. For now, I am concentrating on the authentication file that has user logon (success/failure) and logoff records. The log file is logrotated every week or so. My reporting system parses the log entries and put the result into a postgresql database (I am proposing to use postgresql as the backend). Since this deals with multi-year archive and I believe 'partitioing' is an ideal feature to handle this problem. So here is the design scheme: CREATE TABLE logon_success( name varchar(32) not null, srcip inet not null, date date not null, time time not null, ... ); CREATE TABLE logon_success_yy${year}mm${month}( CHECK (date >= DATE '$year-$month-01' AND date < DATE '$next_year-$next_month-1') ) INHERITS ($tname) ; As you can see from the sample code, I am using perl to dynamically generate children tables as I parse log files in a daily cron job script. Once the log file is analyzed and archived in the database, I have a simple web UI that sysadmin can select and view user logon events. I have built a sample framework and it works so far. Keep in mind, this reporting system is not limited to just user logon, it should also work with system events such as services failures/startup, hardware failures, etc My initial testing has not shown any significant difference between a partitioning approach and a plain (all entries in master) database approach... 2005-01-01 | 00:27:55 | firewood | ssh | Login Successful | None | local | user9819 | 192.168.1.31 My test was based on two artificial tables that has 1700 records per day from 2004-02-01 to 2007-04-27, around 2 million entries that are identical in both tables. My test script: echo Testing database $t1 time based time psql -p 5583 netilla postgres << EOF select count(date) from $t1 where date > '2005-03-01' and date < '2006-12-11'; \q EOF echo Testing database $t2 time based time psql -p 5583 netilla postgres << EOF select count(date) from $t2 where date > '2005-03-01' and date < '2006-12-11'; \q EOF Result: ./timing_test.sh Testing database logon_test time based count --------- 1121472 (1 row) 0.00user 0.00system 0:02.92elapsed 0%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+456minor)pagefaults 0swaps Testing database logon_test2 time based count --------- 1121472 (1 row) 0.00user 0.00system 0:02.52elapsed 0%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+456minor)pagefaults 0swaps But the numbers are really not static and logon_test2 (with partitioning) sometimes behave worse than logon_test... Now here are my questions: 1) Should I use database to implement such a reporting system? Are there any alternatives, architects, designs? 2) Is partitioning a good approach to speed up log query/view? The user comment in partitioning in pgsql manual seems to indicate partitioning may be slower than non-partitioned table under certain circumstances. 3) How to avoid repetitive log entry scanning since my cron job script is run daily but logrotate runs weekly? This means everytime my script will be parsing duplicate entries. 4) When parsing log files, it's quite possible that there are identical entries, for example a user logins really fast, resulting 2 or more identical entries..In this case can I still use primary key/index at all? If I can, how do I design primary key or index to speed up query? 5) What are the most glaring limitations and flaws in my design? 6) What are the best approaches to analyze postgresql query performance and how to improve postgresql query performance? Thank you for taking time to review and answer my questions! Let me know if I am not clear on any specific detail.. Fei
pgsql-performance by date: