Re: What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?
Date
Msg-id 46169103.9050300@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> FWIW, I think we are more in need of coverage of different configure-option
> sets than of OS's per se.
>
>   

If someone would like to put together a list of gaps we can see what we 
can do about it.

For anyone who wants the data on what is being built currently, the 
dashboard data is available via  SOAP interface. An example client to 
fetch the data is below.

cheers

andrew

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|#!/usr/bin/perl

use SOAP::Lite;

my $obj = SOAP::Lite
->uri('http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/PGBuildFarm')
->proxy('http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_status_soap.pl')
;

my $data = $obj->get_status->result;

# you now have the data. One example of how to use it is below.

my @fields = qw(   branch sysname stage status   operating_system os_version   compiler compiler_version architecture
when_agosnapshot build_flags
 
);

my $head = join (' | ', @fields);
print $head,"\n";

foreach my $datum (@$data)
{   my $line = join (' | ', @{$datum}{@fields});   print $line,"\n";
}
|


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: elog(FATAL) vs shared memory
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Fix for large file support