Re: Supartitions in PGSQL 10 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Thomas Kellerer
Subject Re: Supartitions in PGSQL 10
Date
Msg-id 45e742f4-c516-08c6-7351-ca26e516085a@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Supartitions in PGSQL 10  ("Kumar, Virendra" <Virendra.Kumar@guycarp.com>)
Responses RES: Supartitions in PGSQL 10  (Márcio A. Sepp <marcio@zyontecnologia.com.br>)
List pgsql-general
Kumar, Virendra schrieb am 08.01.2018 um 22:12:
> Can you please let us know if Sub-partitions are supported in PGSQL
> (declarative partitions) 10.1. If yes can it be list-list partitions.
> We have a situation where a table is very big having around 2 billion
> rows and is growing. We want to use partitions but not sure if
> sub-partitions are available. The partition key we are looking for is
> having around 8000 different values so it will be 8000 partitions and
> I think that number is really too big number of partitions. For your
> information RDBMS is not yet Postgres, we are evaluating it to see if
> it can support. 

Quote from the manual:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/ddl-partitioning.html#DDL-PARTITIONING-DECLARATIVE

     Partitions may themselves be defined as partitioned tables, using what is called sub-partitioning

Thomas



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Kumar, Virendra"
Date:
Subject: Supartitions in PGSQL 10
Next
From: Márcio A. Sepp
Date:
Subject: RES: Supartitions in PGSQL 10