Gary Greenberg wrote:
> I see it now. It should have been, however, mentioned in documentation for
> the JDBC driver.
Agreed, this question has come up many times recently. Would you like to
write a paragraph or two explaining the situation and the workaround?
> In essence it means that PostgreSQL has fallen into the third world of
> database engines.
...
> I am really disappointed that PostgreSQL is becoming a fossil.
;-) Now you're exaggerating.
> If there are no plans to make this feature work in the very near future,
> I'll be pushing for replacement of the engine.
Ken Johanson posted a preliminary patch in February, but there was a
bunch of issues with it. This is an open source project, so if you'd
like to see it happen, patches are more than welcome.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
