Alex Deucher wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have noticed a strange performance regression and I'm at a loss as
> to what's happening. We have a fairly large database (~16 GB). The
> original postgres 7.4 was running on a sun v880 with 4 CPUs and 8 GB
> of ram running Solaris on local scsi discs. The new server is a sun
> Opteron box with 4 cores, 8 GB of ram running postgres 8.1.4 on Linux
> (AMD64) on a 4 Gbps FC SAN volume. When we created the new database
> it was created from scratch rather than copying over the old one,
> however the table structure is almost identical (UTF8 on the new one
> vs. C on the old). The problem is queries are ~10x slower on the new
> hardware. I read several places that the SAN might be to blame, but
> testing with bonnie and dd indicates that the SAN is actually almost
> twice as fast as the scsi discs in the old sun server. I've tried
> adjusting just about every option in the postgres config file, but
> performance remains the same. Any ideas?
Vacuum? Analayze? default_statistics_target? How many shared_buffers?
effective_cache_size? work_mem?
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alex
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
