Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> tableforest = false gives you something like
>
> <tablename>
> ...
> </tablename>
>
> tableforest = true gives you something like
>
> <tablename>
> ...
> </tablename>
>
> <tablename>
> ...
> </tablename>
>
> ...
>
How do you define the table name when fetching data using a join, union
etc. where the data doesn't necessarily originate from a single table?
Could it be an idea to allow the table name to be specified as a
parameter to the function?
Another neat feature would be if you could specify a set of columns
which should be represented as attributes instead of nodes.
--
Tommy
