Thanks for taking a look Tom:
I am running postgres 8.1.4 on RedHet (CentOS) v4.0. Here is the
description of the purchase_record table (somewhat abbreviated with
uninvolved columns omitted):
# \d purchase_record
Table "public.purchase_record"
Column | Type | Modifiers
----------------------------+---------+----------------------------------------------------
purchase_record_id | bigint | not null default 0
report_specification_id | bigint |
Indexes:
"pr_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (purchase_record_id)
"fki_pr_rs" btree (report_specification_id)
Foreign-key constraints:
"pr_rs" FOREIGN KEY (report_specification_id) REFERENCES
report_specification(report_specification_id) ON UPDATE RESTRICT ON
DELETE CASCADE
# \d report_specification
Table "public.report_specification"
Column | Type | Modifiers
-------------------------+-----------------------+---------------------------------------
report_specification_id | bigint | not null
report_template_id | bigint |
Indexes:
"rs_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (report_specification_id)
"fki_rs_rt_fkey" btree (report_template_id)
Regards,
Jason
Tom Lane wrote:
> jason@buberel.org writes:
>
>> Seems as though I've gotten myself into something of a pickle:
>> I wound up with a fkey constraint and an index on the same table having the
>> same name ('rs_fkey').
>>
>
> That shouldn't be a problem particularly.
>
>
>> The result is an error message when I try to drop the table (cascade) or
>> even drop the constraint:
>> # alter table report_specification drop constraint rs_pkey;
>> NOTICE: constraint pr_rs on table purchase_record depends on index rs_pkey
>> ERROR: "rs_pkey" is an index
>>
>
> That seems odd. What PG version is this exactly ("8.1" is not good
> enough)? What does psql show for "\d report_specification" and
> "\d purchase_record"?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
