Re: Speaking of upgrades... (was Re: Predicted ...) - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ron Johnson
Subject Re: Speaking of upgrades... (was Re: Predicted ...)
Date
Msg-id 45BAC94B.1050104@cox.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Speaking of upgrades... (was Re: Predicted ...)  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Speaking of upgrades... (was Re: Predicted ...)
List pgsql-general
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 01/26/07 20:12, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
>>> There is no set time frame planned that I know of.
>>>
>>> It is more a matter of users that keep the old versions alive. Some with
>>> large datasets on busy servers that can't allocate enough downtime to
>>> upgrade tend to be keeping the older versions running.
>>
>> How much does the on-disk structure of *existing* tables and indexes
>> change between x.y versions?
>>
>> Between, for example, 8.0 and 8.2?
>
> Yes:
>
>     http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/static/migration.html

I was thinking of something like the release notes, but a bit more
targeted.  (I know.  diff the source.)

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/interactive/release-8-2.html

For example, I've read these release notes, and there are some index
modifications, but don't *seem* to be *table* structure changes.

So, in an upgrade from 8.1 to 8.2, what's really preventing pg from
letting the user:

1. Cleanly shutdown pg.
2. Install v8.2.
3. Start pg.
4. psql -c 'REINDEX DATABASE' some_db

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFuslLS9HxQb37XmcRAn90AJ4zCgRqXZbXMmWKTXWT1o7Y2c7S8ACgxYcD
maKk5w+qam1Uy8SDi/R0WQ4=
=UHLl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Speaking of upgrades... (was Re: Predicted ...)
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Speaking of upgrades... (was Re: Predicted ...)