Well, once again I'm hosed because there's no way to tell the optimizer the cost for a user-defined function. I know
thisissue has already been raised (by me!) several times, but I have to remind everyone about this. I frequently must
rewritemy SQL to work around this problem.
Here is the function definition:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION cansmiles(text) RETURNS text
AS '/usr/local/pgsql/lib/libchem.so', 'cansmiles'
LANGUAGE 'C' STRICT IMMUTABLE;
Here is the bad optimization:
db=> explain analyze select version_id, 'Brc1ccc2nc(cn2c1)C(=O)O' from version where version.isosmiles =
cansmiles('Brc1ccc2nc(cn2c1)C(=O)O',1);
QUERY PLAN
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seq Scan on version (cost=0.00..23.41 rows=1 width=4) (actual time=1434.281..1540.253 rows=1 loops=1)
Filter: (isosmiles = cansmiles('Brc1ccc2nc(cn2c1)C(=O)O'::text, 1))
Total runtime: 1540.347 ms
(3 rows)
I've had to break it up into two separate queries. Ironically, for large databases, Postgres does the right thing --
itcomputes the function, then uses the index on the "isosmiles" column. It's blazingly fast and very satisfactory.
Butfor small databases, it apparently decides to recompute the function once per row, making the query N times slower
(N= number of rows) than it should be!
In this instance, there are 1000 rows, and factor of 10^4 is a pretty dramatic slowdown... To make it work, I had to
callthe function separately then use its result to do the select.
db=> explain analyze select cansmiles('Brc1ccc2nc(cn2c1)C(=O)O', 1);
QUERY PLAN
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Result (cost=0.00..0.01 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=1.692..1.694 rows=1 loops=1)
Total runtime: 1.720 ms
(2 rows)
db=> explain analyze select version_id, 'Brc1ccc2nc(cn2c1)C(=O)O' from version where version.isosmiles =
'Brc1ccc2nc(cn2c1)C(=O)O';
QUERY PLAN
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Index Scan using i_version_isosmiles on version (cost=0.00..5.80 rows=1 width=4) (actual time=0.114..0.117 rows=1
loops=1)
Index Cond: (isosmiles = 'Brc1ccc2nc(cn2c1)C(=O)O'::text)
Total runtime: 0.158 ms
(3 rows)
Craig
