Stephen Frost wrote:
>* David Boreham (david_list@boreham.org) wrote:
>
>
>>Fascinating thread for the holidays. I found it interesting that nobody
>>has mentioned
>>NSS (former Netscape SSL library). It has its own bag of problems of
>>course, but
>>for me is potentially more attractive than GNU TLS. e.g. it has FIPS-140
>>certification
>>and is actively under development by a software company with significant
>>resources.
>>It's also very widely deployed. I'm not saying that OpenSSL is bad (it'd
>>probably be my
>>first choice), just that there is another option besides GNU TLS.
>>
>>
>
>Not sure what license that's under,
>From http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/pki/nss/:
'NSS is available under the Mozilla Public License, the GNU General
Public License, and the GNU Lesser General Public License.'
