Re: EXPLAIN ANALYZE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Richard Huxton
Subject Re: EXPLAIN ANALYZE
Date
Msg-id 457D4991.7070607@archonet.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: EXPLAIN ANALYZE  ("Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: EXPLAIN ANALYZE  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs wrote:
> Intermediate results are always better than none at all. I do understand
> what a partial execution would look like - frequently it is the
> preparatory stages that slow a query down - costly sorts, underestimated
> hash joins etc. Other times it is loop underestimation, which can
> usually be seen fairly quickly.

Surely all you're interested in is where the actual plan differs from 
the expected plan? Could you not just have a mode that issues NOTICEs 
when expected/actual number of rows differ by more than a set amount? 
You'd probably want two NOTICEs - one when the threshold is exceeded, 
one when the node completes.

--   Richard Huxton  Archonet Ltd


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Gregory Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: EXPLAIN ANALYZE
Next
From: "Takayuki Tsunakawa"
Date:
Subject: Re: Load distributed checkpoint