Re: Design Considerations for New Authentication Methods - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Design Considerations for New Authentication Methods
Date
Msg-id 454B6DF8.40602@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Design Considerations for New Authentication Methods  ("Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>)
Responses Re: Design Considerations for New Authentication Methods
List pgsql-hackers
>> To be honest, I have often wondered *why* we support kerberos 
>> outside of the uber l33t geek factor. I have not once in a 
>> commercial deployment had a business requirement for the 
>> beast. LDAP? Now that is a whole other issue :)
> 
> Single sign-on in a Windows/AD environment (I'm talking clients on
> windows, servers on linux here - at least in my case). I know several
> people who use it, most just don't post here ;-)

Wouldn't the LDAP auth in 8.2 resolve that?

> 
> Now, it would likely be a lot *easier* to do this with GSSAPI than the
> pure kerberos stuff we have now, given that the Windows native APIs
> support GSSAPI compatible stuff, but not the stuff we have now.

Nod.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake



> 
> //Magnus
> 


-- 
     === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997            http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Bug in WAL backup documentation
Next
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Bug in WAL backup documentation