Re: [DOCS] Replication documentation addition - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Markus Schaber
Subject Re: [DOCS] Replication documentation addition
Date
Msg-id 453F71AE.5070106@logix-tt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [DOCS] Replication documentation addition  (Cesar Suga <sartre@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi, Cesar,

Cesar Suga wrote:
> If people (who read the documentation) professionally work with
> PostgreSQL, they may already have been briefed by those commercial
> offerings in some way.
>
> I think only the source and its tightly coupled (read: can compile along
> with, free as PostgreSQL) components should be packaged into the tarball.
>
> However, I find Bruce's unofficial wiki idea a good one for comparisons.

My suggestion is that the docs should mention only the pure existence of
important third-party packages and projects in those places where it
talks about the deficits that are supposedly fixed by those.

E. G. "There are some third-party packages and projects that aim to
provide multi-master replication, you can search for more information at
http://[unofficial wiki page url] or your favourite search engine.

This way, the docs stay neutral, but point the user to possible
solutions of his problem.

HTH,
Markus
--
Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG
Dipl. Inf.     | Software Development GIS

Fight against software patents in Europe! www.ffii.org
www.nosoftwarepatents.org


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [JDBC] server process (PID 1188) exited with exit code
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Replication documentation addition