Re: work in progress: timestamp patch - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

Dave Cramer wrote:

On 26-Jul-05, at 1:23 AM, Oliver Jowett wrote:

I looked at this and the current code is certainly wrong. The timezone

offset of a Timestamp (deprecated method!) returns the offset of the

JVM's default timezone always. We should indeed be passing the target

calendar and using that.

I've added that change to my patch. Interestingly none of the  regression

tests fail with it changed; we're very short on tests that actually  test

the with-Calendar code..

Well, I actually think this little change is more of the problem than  anything else.

I don't understand what you mean -- are you saying we shouldn't change this?

Did you manage to cobble together a patch for me to test ?

I'll send you a current snapshot in an hour or so. I got sidetracked into trying to work out the semantics of getDate() and getTime() on a timestamptz, still haven't found an entirely satisfactory solution..

-O

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------

TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

              http://archives.postgresql.org