Re: [HACKERS] timestamp subtraction (was Re: formatting intervals - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Graham Davis
Subject Re: [HACKERS] timestamp subtraction (was Re: formatting intervals
Date
Msg-id 452670A0.6040609@refractions.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] timestamp subtraction (was Re: formatting intervals with to_char)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-sql
Great, it's nice to see that this might get rolled into one of the next 
releases.  Thanks,

Graham.


Tom Lane wrote:

>Michael Glaesemann <grzm@seespotcode.net> writes:
>  
>
>>Considering how late it is in the cycle, perhaps the change in  
>>behavior should come in 8.3.
>>    
>>
>
>Yeah, there's not really enough time to think through the consequences
>now.  I'd like to experiment with it for 8.3 though.
>
>            regards, tom lane
>  
>


-- 
Graham Davis
Refractions Research Inc.
gdavis@refractions.net



pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: Stephan Szabo
Date:
Subject: Re: age() vs. timestamp substraction
Next
From: James Robinson
Date:
Subject: SELECT FOR UPDATE/SHARE cannot be applied to the nullable side of an outer join