Re: age() vs. timestamp substraction - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Jean-Paul Argudo
Subject Re: age() vs. timestamp substraction
Date
Msg-id 45262362.4030101@argudo.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: age() vs. timestamp substraction  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: age() vs. timestamp substraction  (Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone.bigpanda.com>)
List pgsql-sql
Hi all,

> Where did you get that idea?  age's reference point is current_date (ie,
> midnight) not now().  There are also some differences in the calculation
> compared to a plain timestamp subtraction.

I'm jumping on this thread to point out a little strange thing to me.
CURRENT_DATE, converted (stupidly) as a string *with* hour is "current
date at mid-day":


test=# select to_char(current_date,'YYYY-MM-DD HH:MI:SS');      to_char
---------------------2006-10-06 12:00:00
(1 ligne)

It was a day when I had to debug a strange behaviour in a customer's
(bad) code :-)

Cheers,

-- 
Jean-Paul Argudo
www.PostgreSQLFr.org
www.dalibo.com


pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] timestamp subtraction (was Re: formatting intervals with to_char)
Next
From: Stephan Szabo
Date:
Subject: Re: age() vs. timestamp substraction