Mark Woodward wrote:
>
> I tried to cluster the data along a particular index but had to cancel it
> after 3 hours.
If the data is in random order, it's faster to do
SELECT * INTO foo_sorted FROM foo ORDER BY bar
then CREATE INDEX, than to run CLUSTER.
That's because CLUSTER does a full index scan of the table, which is
slower than a seqscan + sort if the table is not already clustered.
-- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
