Re: Block B-Tree concept - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: Block B-Tree concept
Date
Msg-id 451A33B0.6000305@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Block B-Tree concept  ("Jim C. Nasby" <jim@nasby.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> Do I understand that to mean that you can no longer lazy vacuum a
> functional index?

With the normal B-trees we have now, there's no problem vacuuming a 
functional index. But it would be a problem with the Block B-tree, 
because the proposed way of vacuuming a Block B-tree involves 
re-evaluating index expressions.

-- 
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Magnus Hagander"
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Bad bug in fopen() wrapper code
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Block B-Tree concept