Re: BUG #17717: Regression in vacuumdb (15 is slower than 10/11 and possible memory issue) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> writes:
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 03:13:23PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm forced to the conclusion that we have to expose some VACUUM
>> options if we want this to work well.  Attached is a draft patch
>> that invents SKIP_DATABASE_STATS and ONLY_DATABASE_STATS options
>> (name bikeshedding welcome) and teaches vacuumdb to use them.

> I assumed it would look like:
> VACUUM (UPDATE_DATABASE_STATS {yes,no,only})

Meh.  We could do it like that, but I think options that look like
booleans but aren't are messy.

            regards, tom lane