Tom Lane ha scritto:
> OK, so if everyone is leaning to #3, the name game remains to be played.
> Do we all agree on this:
>
> "x @> y" means "x contains y"
> "x @< y" means "x is contained in y"
>
> Are we all prepared to sign a solemn oath to commit hara-kiri if we
> invent a new datatype that gets this wrong? No? Maybe these still
> aren't obvious enough.
Does this mean that also contrib/ltree operators will likely change for
consistency?
ltree @> ltree - returns TRUE if left argument is an ancestor of right argument
(or equal).
ltree <@ ltree - returns TRUE if left argument is a descendant of right argument
(or equal).
Best regards
--
Matteo Beccati
http://phpadsnew.comhttp://phppgads.com
