-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Tom Lane wrote:
> Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> writes:
>> Scott Marlowe wrote:
>>>>> ... It's much easier to donate your code to the project
>>>>> and let other people maintain it then to try and maintain your
>>>>> own fork of the code and cross patch their changes into your own.
>>>> Ultrix and SunOS are two counter-examples.
>>> And? Seen either of them around lately?
>
>> I deny the assertion that "not sharing code" is the reason they
>> aren't in the market anymore.
>
> You have as much proof of that as I have of the opposite, namely none
> whatsoever. But certainly you can't put them forward today as examples
> of long-term success of a private fork.
That's the question: did they fail because they were private forks,
or did the *companies* fail because of bad management, bad
marketing, etc?
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Is "common sense" really valid?
For example, it is "common sense" to white-power racists that
whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins
are mud people.
However, that "common sense" is obviously wrong.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFE+fgAS9HxQb37XmcRArz4AKCGrtyT9v9TsZY+MMNgIDTlO9TJfQCgl0Cr
FXyY2ZMua9YR6ni9CulPgKY=
=opkW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
