Patrick TJ McPhee wrote:
> I have a Red Hat ELsmp system running on a dual opteron hp server with
> 16 gigs of memory. I believe the RH installation is straight out of the
> box. I've compiled postgres 8.1.4 from sources.
>
> The problem is that query performance is horrible, and I can't think
> why, although it seems clear the problem is outside the query engine.
> For instance, "select 1" takes on the order of 100ms. Explain analyze
> doesn't shed much light on why this might be:
>
> explain analyze select 1;
> QUERY PLAN
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Result (cost=0.00..0.01 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=0.005..0.006 rows=1 loops=1)
> Total runtime: 0.059 ms
> (2 rows)
>
> But if I turn on duration logging, I get timings like
> LOG: duration: 91.480 ms
>
> I was able to pg_reload 80 gigs of data in a reasonable amount of time, but
> individual queries are taking a long time.
>
> I'm wondering if anyone's seen anything like this.
Vacuum? Analyze?
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
