Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
> It is however async replication so you can loose data commited on the
> master but not yet replicated to the slaves in case you loose the master
> completely.
Yes, here is an insufficient point of Slony-I, i think.
Most systems will not permit the committed data to be lost, so use is limited.
>> IMO, log-based replication is needed also for PostgreSQL just like MySQL.
Well, I had misunderstood MySQL. Its replication is also asynchronous.
regards;
