Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Jim Nasby wrote:
>> First, +1 on Josh B.'s point about trying out Trac, since it's
>> already up and running. Josh D., can you just turn that on? (BTW, is
>> trac linked off http://commandprompt.com anywhere? I had to google to
>> find it yesterday...)
>
> I just noticed that the code repository on that Trac is broken in more
> ways than I had realized. For starters it doesn't seem to have the 8.1
> branch or tags (apparently it's out of date).
It doesn't?
http://projects.commandprompt.com/public/pgsql/browser/tags/REL8_1_4/pgsql
What are you looking at Alvaro?
>
> Doesn't Trac have a CVS plugin?
No, like the rest of the world, Trac has moved on from CVS ;)
> It will just cause confusion to have a
> SVN repo that doesn't reflect reality
Well sure... but again... what are you looking at, because it looks fine
to me?
And to be clear, I would only expect that this would be used as a
reference, that is all. The ability to link from the wiki directly to a
source file or changeset could be useful.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL
solutionssince 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
