Re: 8.2 features status - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: 8.2 features status
Date
Msg-id 20060810232033.GB5399@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 8.2 features status  (Jim Nasby <jnasby@pervasive.com>)
Responses Re: 8.2 features status
Re: 8.2 features status
List pgsql-hackers
Jim Nasby wrote:
> First, +1 on Josh B.'s point about trying out Trac, since it's  
> already up and running. Josh D., can you just turn that on? (BTW, is  
> trac linked off http://commandprompt.com anywhere? I had to google to  
> find it yesterday...)

I just noticed that the code repository on that Trac is broken in more
ways than I had realized.  For starters it doesn't seem to have the 8.1
branch or tags (apparently it's out of date).

Doesn't Trac have a CVS plugin?  It will just cause confusion to have a
SVN repo that doesn't reflect reality -- which it wouldn't even if it
weren't broken.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "korryd@enterprisedb.com"
Date:
Subject: Re: Plugins redux (was Re: [PATCHES] PL instrumentation
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Rethinking top plan representation (or, Query vs. UPDATE RETURNING)