Re: 8.2 features status - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Neil Conway
Subject Re: 8.2 features status
Date
Msg-id 1155257394.5206.9.camel@localhost
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 8.2 features status  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: 8.2 features status
Re: 8.2 features status
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 17:33 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> No, like the rest of the world, Trac has moved on from CVS ;)

There is CVSTrac (www.cvstrac.org), which actually predates Trac.

However, is there a reason to use Trac beyond the fact that it is
already setup? ISTM we only need a wiki, and don't need the other
features of Trac, such as the bug tracker.

-Neil




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.2 features status
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.2 features status