Re: 8.2 features status - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: 8.2 features status
Date
Msg-id 44DBDA5E.4010205@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 8.2 features status  (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Neil Conway wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 17:33 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> No, like the rest of the world, Trac has moved on from CVS ;)
> 
> There is CVSTrac (www.cvstrac.org), which actually predates Trac.
> 
> However, is there a reason to use Trac beyond the fact that it is
> already setup? ISTM we only need a wiki, and don't need the other
> features of Trac, such as the bug tracker.

Well that is certainly the question but the bug tracker could easily 
turn into a todo list as well. It is a very powerful tool that is 
relatively flexible.

Joshua D. Drake


> 
> -Neil
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> 
>                http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
> 


-- 
   === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240   Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL
solutionssince 1997             http://www.commandprompt.com/
 




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.2 features status
Next
From: andrew@dunslane.net
Date:
Subject: Re: Buildfarm failure on ecpg/test/pgtypeslib