Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
>> And if that didn't convince you, I still got PL/sh in the wait ...
>
> It seems like there may be enough interest in PL/Ruby to justify
> including it in our distro, but after taking a look at the package
> I can see a couple of pretty serious objections:
>
> 1. Wrong license. Unless the author can be persuaded to relicense as
> straight BSD, this discussion is a waste of time.
As I mentioned previously, I have already negotiated for a relicense.
>
> 2. Coding style. The man does not believe in comments; do we really
> think anyone else is going to be able to maintain his work?
Yes, this was one of my concerns.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> regards, tom lane
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL
solutionssince 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
