Re: Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it
Date
Msg-id 44BA7378.9070800@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it  ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>)
Responses Re: Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Dave Page wrote:
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org on behalf of Tom Lane
> Sent: Sun 7/16/2006 3:29 PM
> To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: [HACKERS] Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it
>  
>   
>> AFAICT, snake is the only Windows machine that
>> actually runs the buildfarm on a regular schedule, and even it is just
>> running once a day.  
>>     
>
> I can bump that up as high as you'd like within reason. 4? 6 times a day?
>
>   

Let's go for 6, at least for HEAD. Under normal use buildfarm doesn't 
actually do anything unless it detects a change in the source, and it 
makes sure there isn't a collision by using a lockfile. That means it is 
safe to schedule builds fairly frequently.


cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Petr Jelinek
Date:
Subject: Re: Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it