Neil Conway wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-07-15 at 00:05 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> The fundamental problem with find_static is that it hasn't got a clue
>> about likely future changes, nor about what we think external add-ons
>> might want
>>
>
> We could annotate the source to indicate that some functions are
> deliberately intended to be externally visible, but not referenced
> within the source tree, and then teach find_static to grok that
> annotation.
>
>
I thought of that, but what if one gets missed? Is the tool worth the
hassle?
cheers
andrew
