Re: [PATCHES] [patch 0/9] annual pgcrypto update - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marko Kreen
Subject Re: [PATCHES] [patch 0/9] annual pgcrypto update
Date
Msg-id e51f66da0607150415r797dee5cmd3b8fac8dbef34df@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] [patch 0/9] annual pgcrypto update  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [PATCHES] [patch 0/9] annual pgcrypto update
List pgsql-hackers
On 7/14/06, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I wrote:
> > Applied, thanks.  What I now see is that pgp-pubkey-decrypt passes on
> > a 32-bit machine but dumps core on a 64-bit machine, with SIGSEGV here:
>
> Addendum: seems it only fails without openssl.

iMath's protability checks failed.  Attached patch drops them
and expects postgres.h to give correct types.

Also enable asserts to fail earlier.

--
marko

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Teodor Sigaev
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch to mark items as static or not used
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch to mark items as static or not used