Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>>>
>>> Second, its assuming that Thomas, or any other pl/java developer,
>>> *isn't* going to watching for any changes to the API fairly closely,
>>> considering they know it does happen, and, therefore, won't make a
>>> change to their development code to accommodate that when the time
>>> comes ...
>>>
>> As we have explained before, there really isn't an API in any
>> meaningful sense. Thomas will undoubtedly be vigilant, but the real
>> danger is that something non-obvious will change and break stuff.
>
> But, as Tom has already explained, *he's* not going to make changes
> pl/java if its committed ... how many will even have java (or gcj) to
> even test it to see if its broken?
>
Quite so. That's why buildfarm for pl/java will be important when I can
get it done.
cheers
andrew
