On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>>
>> Second, its assuming that Thomas, or any other pl/java developer, *isn't*
>> going to watching for any changes to the API fairly closely, considering
>> they know it does happen, and, therefore, won't make a change to their
>> development code to accommodate that when the time comes ...
>>
> As we have explained before, there really isn't an API in any meaningful
> sense. Thomas will undoubtedly be vigilant, but the real danger is that
> something non-obvious will change and break stuff.
But, as Tom has already explained, *he's* not going to make changes
pl/java if its committed ... how many will even have java (or gcj) to even
test it to see if its broken?
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
