Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Quite so. That's why buildfarm for pl/java will be important when I can
> get it done.
+1 --- the important point about an arrangement like that is that it'll
be clear from the buildfarm results that pljava is broken, and not the
whole system. (Contrast the current all-red status board, which I feel
safe in blaming on Bruce ... off to take a look ...)
regards, tom lane
