Re: debian package splitting: pgagent should be - Mailing list pgadmin-hackers

From Raphaël Enrici
Subject Re: debian package splitting: pgagent should be
Date
Msg-id 44AE636D.3040407@club-internet.fr
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: debian package splitting: pgagent should be distributed separately  ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>)
List pgadmin-hackers
Dave Page wrote:
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Raphaël Enrici [mailto:blacknoz@club-internet.fr]
>>Sent: 06 July 2006 17:59
>>To: Dave Page
>>Cc: PgAdmin Hackers
>>Subject: debian package splitting: pgagent should be
>>distributed separately
>>
>>Hi Dave,
>>
>>as you know, I'm about to split the debian package so that pgagent can
>>be installed separately from pgAdmin III on a server for example.
>>
>>I'm asking to myself if it would not be a good thing to distribute it
>>separately upstream. I mean, something like adminpacks that would live
>>its life in itself and not as a part of pgAdmin III.
>>
>>What do you think about it ?
>
>
> Not entirely sure. Maybe we need a ./configure switch to build just pgAgent (or any other /xtra/ part)?

Ok, it would help Florian to disable the build...
./configure --disable-pgagent.

Concerning my particular case it's not that important. The debian
packaging system is able to generate multiple "binary packages" from one
"source package". It's just a question of packaging.


> I'll ask some of the guys here what they think.

Ok, let us know and a big hello to everybody around ;)

Cheers,
Raph

pgadmin-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Florian G. Pflug"
Date:
Subject: Re: Bugs created by new UI / Introduction of
Next
From: svn@pgadmin.org
Date:
Subject: SVN Commit by dpage: r5249 - in trunk/pgadmin3/src: frm include main