Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Would some people please run the attached test procedure and report back
> the results? I basically need to know the patch is an improvement on
> more platforms than just my own. Thanks
Debian Sarge/AMD64 Kernel 2.6.16.16 (all tests done multiple times with
variation of less then 10%):
-HEAD:
real 0m0.486s
user 0m0.064s
sys 0m0.048s
-HEAD with 100000 "SELECT 1;" queries:
real 0m4.763s
user 0m0.896s
sys 0m1.232s
-HEAD + stats:
real 0m0.720s
user 0m0.128s
sys 0m0.096s
-HEAD + stats (100k):
real 0m7.204s
user 0m1.504s
sys 0m1.028s
-HEAD + stats + patch:
there is something weird going on here - I get either runtimes like:
real 0m0.729s
user 0m0.092s
sys 0m0.100s
and occasionally:
real 0m3.926s
user 0m0.144s
sys 0m0.140s
(always ~0,7 vs ~4 seconds - same variation as Qingqing Zhou seems to see)
-HEAD + stats + patch(100k):
similiar variation with:
real 0m7.955s
user 0m1.124s
sys 0m1.164s
and
real 0m11.836s
user 0m1.368s
sys 0m1.156s
(ie 7-8 seconds vs 11-12 seconds)
looks like this patch is actually a loss on that box.
Stefan
