Re: [HACKERS] \copy: unexpected response (4) - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] \copy: unexpected response (4)
Date
Msg-id 449.1249681500@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: \copy: unexpected response (4)  (Neil Best <nbest@ci.uchicago.edu>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] \copy: unexpected response (4)
Re: [HACKERS] \copy: unexpected response (4)
List pgsql-general
Neil Best <nbest@ci.uchicago.edu> writes:
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> BTW, the "SSL renegotiation failure" bit
>> suggests that it could have been an OpenSSL bug not a real network
>> lossage, so you might want to see how up-to-date your openssl libraries
>> are.

> Thanks for your comments, Tom.  The operation seems more reliable if I
> move the data to the server and do it across a local connection, which
> I presume does not involve SSL, so that may be the weak link as you
> surmise.  Would you expect the SSL library problem more likely to be
> on the server or the client, or is it just hard to say?

You're talking like you've found this to be repeatable.  Is it?

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Changing referenced primary key column type
Next
From: Christine Desmuke
Date:
Subject: Re: Make check fails on 8.3.7