Re: Best high availability solution ? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Arnaud Lesauvage
Subject Re: Best high availability solution ?
Date
Msg-id 447D6F91.706@freesurf.fr
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Best high availability solution ?  ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>)
Responses Re: Best high availability solution ?  (Tino Wildenhain <tino@wildenhain.de>)
List pgsql-general
Dave Page a écrit :
> Slony-I only exists for Windows in a not-even-beta state at the moment,
> so even if you get things up and running using a virtual IP solution you
> will be hand-holding Slony until it gets properly released.

OK, I thought it was in production stage.

> If I'm honest, I think your boss is going to be disappointed. You would
> add a *lot* of complexity to the system to make it handle failures with
> zero intervention, and that extra complexity is probably more likely to
> go wrong than a single server. I'd spend your time and money on making
> sure your raid & ups are good, that you are running on server grade
> hardware with ECC RAM, and that you have good out of band management
> facilities so even if you are away from the office you can connect via
> VPN/modem or whatever and fix things.

I think you're right.
Is there a simple replication solution for windows then ? Or will
I have to stop the master postgresql at night to pgdump and
pgrestore on the backup server ?

If I have a synchronized backup server (even if it synchronizes
once or twice a day, this might be OK), I could just write a
simple script that would change the host file of the clients to
have the postgresql's name to point to the backup IP...

--
Arnaud


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: Re: Best high availability solution ?
Next
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: UTF-8 context of BYTEA datatype??