>
> As an example of absurdity of this problem: let's assume there is known
> distribution with buggy gethostbyname(). Fact, that we know about this,
> shouldn't stop us developing TCP/IP applications. Especially, if there
> is also patch for this bug :)
>
> It would be real shame to prevent using generator for SETOF functions
> because it is most natural match for plpgsql's "return next"
All I was saying was that we need to account for the use of 2.4 :). So
as long as we document (as you suggest) we should be good. Sorry if I
wasn't clear.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
>
> --Sven Suursoho
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
