LARGE table won't use index? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From bemowski@yahoo.com (Paul Bemowski)
Subject LARGE table won't use index?
Date
Msg-id 44491fb2.0106151414.5451f9bd@posting.google.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: LARGE table won't use index?  (Edwin Grubbs <egrubbs@rackspace.com>)
List pgsql-general
I'm having a problem getting PostgreSQL 7.2.1 to use an index when it
is painfully obvious that the index will be faster.  Here is the
situation:

2 tables:

1) keyword
keyword_id integer primary key
word varchar(50)

- the word is indexed (keyword_word_index)
- the table contains ~100k rows

2) article_keyword (this is a mapping table for a many-many)
article_id integer
keyword_id integer
relevenace integer
primary_key(article_id, keyword_id)

- the keyword_id col is indexed (ak_kwid_index)
- the table contains ~2 million rows.

OK. Consider the follwing psql/explain output:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
search.dev=# select * from keyword where word='spam';
 keyword_id | word
------------+------
       2616 | spam
(1 row)

search.dev=# explain select * from article_keyword where
keyword_id=2616;
NOTICE:  QUERY PLAN:

Index Scan using ak_kwid_index on article_keyword  (cost=0.00..2990.85
rows=810 width=12)

EXPLAIN
search.dev=# explain select * from article_keyword where keyword_id in
search.dev-# (select keyword_id from keyword where word='spam');
NOTICE:  QUERY PLAN:

Seq Scan on article_keyword  (cost=0.00..3378740757.90 rows=1820389
width=12)
  SubPlan
    ->  Materialize  (cost=1856.04..1856.04 rows=1345 width=4)
          ->  Index Scan using keyword_word_index on keyword
(cost=0.00..1856.04 rows=1345 width=4)

EXPLAIN
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Note that when I query using the explicit keyword_id, the query plan
uses the index at a cost of about 3000.  When I use a subselect (which
returns the EXACT same keyword_id and I explicitly used) the plan uses
a sequence scan of 2 million rows at a cost of about 3.3 billion!!

I really need for postgres to use the indexes on the mapping table,
what can I do.  Any help from the PostgreSQL gods is appreciated.

Paul Bemowski
bemowski@yahoo.com

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "bugi"
Date:
Subject: Re: followup on view/rule/delete problem.
Next
From: Carfield Yim
Date:
Subject: Newbie question: How to check how many tables avaliable at that database?