Re: Shared memory - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Hallgren
Subject Re: Shared memory
Date
Msg-id 4428125D.7000707@tada.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Shared memory  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Shared memory
Re: Shared memory
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> It's only that much difference?  Given all the other advantages of
> separating the JVM from the backends, I'd say you should gladly pay
> that price.
> 
If I'm right, and the most common scenario is clients using connection pools, then it's very 
likely that you don't get any advantages at all. Paying for nothing with a 440% increase in 
calling time (at best) seems expensive :-)

Regards,
Thomas Hallgren



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Shared memory
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Shared memory