Re: Future versions of psqlODBC - Mailing list pgsql-odbc

From Hiroshi Inoue
Subject Re: Future versions of psqlODBC
Date
Msg-id 442186BC.2000309@tpf.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Future versions of psqlODBC  ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>)
List pgsql-odbc
Dave Page wrote:

>
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us]
>>Sent: 22 March 2006 14:48
>>To: Dave Page
>>Cc: Ludek Finstrle; pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org
>>Subject: Re: [ODBC] Future versions of psqlODBC
>>
>>"Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> writes:
>>
>>
>>>We could just return to plain old psqlodbc/PostgreSQL ?
>>>
>>>
>>Please.  This is going to be confusing enough anyway.
>>
>>Do you expect to resurrect the separate ANSI/Unicode driver versions
>>someday?  If so, please consider making the build create both driver
>>names right away, even if there's not any distinction at the moment.
>>Otherwise you'll be creating useless thrash in the packaging and
>>people's odbcinst.ini files, as they have to change the driver name
>>only to have to change it again later.
>>
>>
>
>Hiroshi tells me we won't need two drivers and that the 07 branch should
>not suffer the problems we had with 08.00 that caused us to move back to
>two.
>

AFAIR I didn't tell you such a thing.  Though I've heard no problem from
Japanese( e.g. about the
 use with MS Access) so far ,  I don't know if it solves the problems
e.g. about BDE or under
other languages' environment.

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue

pgsql-odbc by date:

Previous
From: Hiroshi Inoue
Date:
Subject: Re: newline in varchar causing funny behavior?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Compiling psqlodbc REL-07_03_ENHANCED and 07.03.260