> On 16 Mar 2020, at 17:12, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Still, I think the number of people who'd get bit by that could be
> counted without running out of fingers, while it seems quite likely
> that many people will soon need to build our back branches on
> platforms that won't have xml2-config.
I agree with this assessment.
> So I'm now leaning to "back-patch and make sure to mention this in
> the next release notes". Barring objections, I'll do that soon.
None from me.
> I don't have a problem with s/libxml/libxml2/ in the running text
> (without changing the switch name).
+1
> Can't get too excited about
> <productname> though. I think we've only consistently applied
> that tag to PostgreSQL itself.
Fair enough. Looking at a random sample it seems we use a bit of a mix of
nothing, <application /> and <productname /> (the latter ones being more or
less equal in DocBook IIRC) to mark up externals.
cheers ./daniel
