Re: What's with this lib suffix? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: What's with this lib suffix?
Date
Msg-id 440216C6.1080807@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: What's with this lib suffix?  (Thomas Hallgren <thomas@tada.se>)
List pgsql-hackers

Thomas Hallgren wrote:

> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>>
>> Enumkit's makefile uses pgxs happily to make foo.so without the lib 
>> prefix. The relevant portion reads like this:
>>
>> MODULES = $(TYPENAME)
>>
> Yeah. But using MODULES your are assumed to have one object file per 
> module. I need to use MODULE_big.



Yes, I see that now.

Maybe we should add a MODULE_dyn target to pgxs.mk.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: TOAST compression
Next
From: "Clark C. Evans"
Date:
Subject: Re: constraints and sql92 information_schema compliance