Re: windows / initdb oddness - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: windows / initdb oddness
Date
Msg-id 43FC9B74.8060309@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: windows / initdb oddness  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:

>
>Is there any reason to worry about an accidental environment conflict?
>If someone mistakenly did "export PG_RESTRICT_EXEC=1", it looks to me
>like this would cause the re-exec bit to be skipped, but I suppose the
>worst possible consequence is that the postmaster would refuse to start.
>Is there anything I don't see?  (Of course, the magic argument method
>can be broken manually in just the same way...)
>
>    
>  
>

Yes. The effect would be that we just do exactly what we do today 
anyway.  We could make the value some more obscure token, but I don't 
see much point.

cheers

andrew



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: Pgfoundry and gborg: shut one down
Next
From: Stephan Szabo
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_config, pg_service.conf, postgresql.conf ....