Re: PostgreSQL ad images - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: PostgreSQL ad images
Date
Msg-id 43F5FBE4.3010603@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL ad images  (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL ad images  (Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de>)
List pgsql-advocacy
> I believe there was some concern by some of the graphics donors about re-using
> the graphics in commercial products.  I guess I would just wonder if we
> should refuse graphics that are not BSD licensed?  If we make clear as to
> which license applies to which graphics, I think we should be open to
> accepting more than just BSD.
>
>
In the essence of keeping things simple. They should just be BSD licensed.
We are not in the business of keeping track of IP rights.

The only way to be sure would be to require a specific license.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

P.S. I actually don't care if they are BSD but I think they should be "1"
license.


--
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: PLphp, PLperl - http://www.commandprompt.com/


pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL ad images
Next
From: Mike Ellsworth
Date:
Subject: Elephant images