> Perhaps you can explain further? My understanding was that the desired
> functionality was that any failure would cause all aspects of the load
> to fail also, so I don't see any problem with that; clearly I need to
> listen to your thoughts.
Maybe we're not talking about the same thing? I was talking about the
begin/commit statements that are already in the dump - doesn't wrapping
the entire lot guarantee failure when you have: begin; begin; commit;
commit; ?
Chris
